Quick Search
Categories
- Stevens Institute of Technology
- Pay to Play
- Content Research Area
- Quality of Life Issues
- OPRA (Open Public Records Act)
- Bribes, Payoffs, and Politics
- Letters to the Editor
- Voter Information
- OPMA (Open Public Meetings Act)
- FREE SPEECH and INTERNET ISSUES
- Eminent Domain
- Governor Corzine
- Editorials
- Lawsuits and Legal Actions
- Hoboken News
- Health Issues
- Employment Opportunities
- Regionalize and Shared Services
- Investigations (Restricted Access)
- Government
- Public Official Report Card
- Political Commentary
- Technology
- Payments In Lieu of Taxes
- Consumer Issues
- Affordable Housing
- 2006 N.J. U.S. Senate Race
- U.S. Senator Robert Menendez
- Homeland Security
- NJ NY Port Authority
- R.I.C.O. Act
- NJ.COM
- Editorials - New Jersey Newspapers
- POG - People for OPen Government
- Classifieds
- Politics
- Investigative Agencies
- Hoboken City Council Video
- Presidential Election 2008
- Investigative Report
- Obama
- Area Event Calendar
- Presedential electiom 2008
- New Jersey League of Municipalities
- NJ State Court System
- National Politics
- Social Interaction
- Shrink for Men
- Governor Chris Christie
- Tenant Rights
- NJ League of Municipalities
- ObamaCare
- NYC GROUND ZERO
- Political Figures
- Health Care
- Hoboken Lawsuits
- Featured News
- NYSC
- IRS TAX RELIEF
- Federal Budget
- Healthcare Fraud
- New Jersey For Profit Hospitals
- Hudson County Emergency Medical Services
Appellate court tosses out memo
- 6-2-2008
- Categorized in: City Council
Appellate court tosses out memo
Monday, June 02, 2008 Jersey Journal
The state Superior Court Appellate Division upheld a trial court's decision to nullify a 2005 "memorandum of understanding" between the City of Hoboken and Tarragon/URSA.
The appellate court agreed that the memorandum "effectively appointed Tarragon as the redeveloper" of a 10.75-acre site adjacent to the Northwest Redevelopment Area without following the proper steps under the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law.
"Read together, the memorandum of understanding and Resolution No. 8 (passed by City Council for approval) clearly attempt to circumvent the procedures of the LRHL" by designating a redeveloper before designating the area in need of development or approving a redevelopment plan.
"We're very pleased, but I'm not surprised - this was illegal conduct," said Leah Healey of Hoboken Parks. "I hope the city (now) realizes that they can't operate in the redevelopment world without following the procedures."
Hoboken Corporation Counsel Steve Kleinman said, "It appears that the appellate division found a procedural flaw in the redevelopment process. We respectfully disagree with that decision and we'll consider further avenues of appeal."
Email to Friend
Fill in the form below to send this article to a friend:
Recent Blogs
- HAS PREDATORY HEALTH CARE LENDING COME TO HOBOKEN?
- The Emotionally Abusive Personality: Is She a Borderline or a Narcissist?
- Withholding Sex as a Form of Punishment
- Don't Marry Essay. Why Marriage Has Become a Raw Deal for Men
- NJ Business Facts
- What the Parking/Transportation industry is saying about Hoboken's Automated Garage
- You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig
- Hoboken Board of Education
Recent Employment Opportunities
- Technology Consultant - City of Hoboken
- Finance Director City of Hoboken
- ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR
- Civil Service Commission Seeks Entry-Level Firefighter Applicants Applications for the entry-level Firefighter Test will be accepted for 70 municipalities and other local jurisdictions
- Senior Accountant: Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ
- City of Hoboken - Fire Department Audit
- Hoboken: ZONING OFFICER