Quick Search
Categories
- Stevens Institute of Technology
- Pay to Play
- Content Research Area
- Quality of Life Issues
- OPRA (Open Public Records Act)
- Bribes, Payoffs, and Politics
- Letters to the Editor
- Voter Information
- OPMA (Open Public Meetings Act)
- FREE SPEECH and INTERNET ISSUES
- Eminent Domain
- Governor Corzine
- Editorials
- Lawsuits and Legal Actions
- Hoboken News
- Health Issues
- Employment Opportunities
- Regionalize and Shared Services
- Investigations (Restricted Access)
- Government
- Public Official Report Card
- Political Commentary
- Technology
- Payments In Lieu of Taxes
- Consumer Issues
- Affordable Housing
- 2006 N.J. U.S. Senate Race
- U.S. Senator Robert Menendez
- Homeland Security
- NJ NY Port Authority
- R.I.C.O. Act
- NJ.COM
- Editorials - New Jersey Newspapers
- POG - People for OPen Government
- Classifieds
- Politics
- Investigative Agencies
- Hoboken City Council Video
- Presidential Election 2008
- Investigative Report
- Obama
- Area Event Calendar
- Presedential electiom 2008
- New Jersey League of Municipalities
- NJ State Court System
- National Politics
- Social Interaction
- Shrink for Men
- Governor Chris Christie
- Tenant Rights
- NJ League of Municipalities
- ObamaCare
- NYC GROUND ZERO
- Political Figures
- Health Care
- Hoboken Lawsuits
- Featured News
- NYSC
- IRS TAX RELIEF
- Federal Budget
- Healthcare Fraud
- New Jersey For Profit Hospitals
- Hudson County Emergency Medical Services
Muni Garage plan is sound, serving the needs of all in the city
- 6-26-2006
- Categorized in: Hoboken Municipal Garage Sale, Municipal Budget
Muni Garage plan is sound, serving the needs of all in the city
06/25/2006 Hoboken Reporter
Dear Editor:
As Chairman of the Observer Highway Redevelopment Advisory Committee, I would like to respond to last week's inaccurate letter by Hank Forrest.
Work on a plan for the Municipal Garage was not done in a "short time frame" as Mr. Forrest states. It began in April 2005 when the City Council proposed the creation of the OHRA Committee, later appointed by Mayor Roberts. The Mayor identified PPSA as the planning firm he wanted for the project -- the same firm Mr. Forrest often compliments for their work on the Master Plan.
Fifteen residents from five wards worked together with PPSA, and city officials to craft a plan that maximizes the property value without further scarring a neighborhood with more out-of-scale high rise development. The City Council conducted a fair and open public process before unanimously approving the plan.
The Reporter's coverage clearly explained the reasons for the failure of the first effort to sell the property. The redevelopment plan is not at fault. The article notes it was extremely difficult for developers to present a response to the Request for Proposals in 17 business days. The short timeframe coupled with the lack of a "Phase Two" environmental study made it very difficult for developers to make offers. The fact that two local groups made the effort to bid under the circumstances is a credit to them.
I would invite Mr. Forrest to take a look at the renderings drawn up by architect Dean Marchetto on behalf of Metro-Ran. I think he would agree that it would be a "handsome" project.
The planning basis/rationale is outlined right in the redevelopment plan, Mr. Forrest. In part it states "The plan replaces the low-intensity, unattractive, municipal public works facility with a high-quality residential development that complements the neighborhood."
The 7-story portion of the project along Willow Avenue is designed to compliment all existing structures in the neighborhood, but none more so than the Neumann Leather buildings on Willow Avenue. This portion of the Neumann property is the oldest. In addition to complimenting this historic structure physically, the plan also allows for ground floor uses similar to those of the entrepreneurs and artists in the Neumann building today. It is false to say a "70 foot high blank wall" will be built at the north end of the block As the redevelopment agency of the City of Hoboken, members of the elected City Council -- and not the appointed Planning or Zoning Boards -- have all say over what is allowed in Redevelopment Zones.
The committee, planners, and council members took all aspects of the community into account when putting this plan together.
The City Council has set a standard of cooperation in this process that should be applauded. It would be a shame to throw it all away, especially on the eve of the creation of several other redevelopment plans for the Southwest and beyond.
Lane Bajardi
Email to Friend
Fill in the form below to send this article to a friend:
Recent Blogs
- HAS PREDATORY HEALTH CARE LENDING COME TO HOBOKEN?
- The Emotionally Abusive Personality: Is She a Borderline or a Narcissist?
- Withholding Sex as a Form of Punishment
- Don't Marry Essay. Why Marriage Has Become a Raw Deal for Men
- NJ Business Facts
- What the Parking/Transportation industry is saying about Hoboken's Automated Garage
- You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig
- Hoboken Board of Education
Recent Employment Opportunities
- Technology Consultant - City of Hoboken
- Finance Director City of Hoboken
- ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR
- Civil Service Commission Seeks Entry-Level Firefighter Applicants Applications for the entry-level Firefighter Test will be accepted for 70 municipalities and other local jurisdictions
- Senior Accountant: Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ
- City of Hoboken - Fire Department Audit
- Hoboken: ZONING OFFICER